Friday, June 27, 2008

Oil Up Again - Great Oil Story in USA Today

All,
 
Here is a very thourough article on Oil and speculation as an investment tool.  We have discussed this issue before, and the USA Today hits it on the head.  The article should be required reading at the gas pump to educate Americans on what would really help ease the pressure on the Oil markets, and what speculators really do.  Speculation is hardly ever as evil as it sounds.  Read through to the end, and you will see the solution we have talked about and that I support big time: Change the margin requirement for investing in futures.  It works for small stocks and option calls, it will work for futures.
 

U.S.News & World Report
6 Myths About Oil Speculators
Friday June 27, 10:44 am ET
By Rick Newman

So now we know who's really responsible for $4 gas. Finger-pointers from Washington, the International Monetary Fund, and even Saudi Arabia no longer seem to buy the idea that the demand for oil around the world is simply growing faster than the supply, driving prices to record highs close to $140 per barrel. There must be a more nefarious reason, it seems. So now entering this drama is a villain everybody can hate: The Evil Speculator.

ADVERTISEMENT
At recent congressional hearings, politicians and energy experts argued that speculators have artificially added $30 or more to the cost of a barrel of oil, turned oil trading into a global poker game, and doubled the price of gasoline practically overnight.

But who are these party crashers? Where did they come from? How are they doing this? And who can stop them? We'd all like to see a superhero swoop in and smite the speculators, saving Gotham from the peril of $4 gas. The only problem is, speculators aren't quite the bogeymen that politicians want us to think--and they even play an important role in the oil markets and the global economy. Some major misconceptions:

Speculators are inherently bad for the economy. There's no doubt that speculators are out to make money, by buying a commodity like oil (or gold, or real estate) when they think the price is likely to rise and they'll be able to sell for a profit. But they also help sustain the market for buyers and sellers and provide ways for individuals and businesses to offset risks.

Many companies, for instance, want to lock in the price they're going to pay down the road for petroleum products and other supplies they need to run their businesses. So they make agreements with suppliers on a price they'll pay next year, or the year after, when they actually take possession of the oil. Buying and selling such "futures contracts" makes these companies speculators by definition, since they're placing a bet on the future price of oil.

Companies doing this kind of hedging include gasoline refiners, airlines, shipping companies, and others that spend a lot on fuel or petroleum. Often they use investment banks or other intermediaries to arrange the deals. They might be gambling, but this kind of speculation actually helps companies run their businesses more smoothly, and if they guess right on future prices, it may give them a competitive advantage against other companies that don't plan as prudently.

There's a Speculator Star Chamber somewhere. Global markets are so abstruse to ordinary folks that it's easy to imagine a cabal of evil geniuses pulling the levers from some fortified complex in London or Geneva. But that's the Hollywood version. "The market is so competitive that that's nonsense," says Bob Hodrick, a finance professor at Columbia Business School. "There's no way for everyone to communicate and get together and say, 'We're going to buy and drive the price up.' " There are thousands of investors around the world placing bets every day on whether oil prices will go up or down--and they have no way of knowing who their fellow speculators are. All they know is the current price, shown on a computer monitor, plus whatever their own research tells them.

Speculators are super-rich market manipulators. Certainly some are super-rich, including investors in sovereign wealth funds from Middle Eastern and Asian nations. But new data show that many oil speculators these days may be big pension and index funds that invest on behalf of ordinary working Americans. These huge investment funds have typically invested in equities, but in recent years they've been adding commodities--including oil--to their portfolios as a way to diversify.

Even if the commodity portion of these portfolios is just 3 or 4 percent, that can trigger big swings in the oil markets, where most investors up till now have been smaller players. "There's no malice or manipulation here," says Ed Krapels, an analyst with the research firm Energy Security Analysis. But the entry of such big institutional investors into the oil market could definitely contribute to rising prices, especially since they tend to buy and hold securities like futures contracts, instead of quickly selling--which contributes to scarcity and rising prices.

The government tracks speculators and knows who they are. Part of the reason nobody's really sure what effect speculators have on the oil markets is a lack of information. Exchanges like the New York Mercantile Exchange track the activities of their members, but even then, a trader could be a speculator one day, buying oil or futures contracts, and a seller the next day: Nobody checks a "speculator" box when making a trade.

A recent study by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates commodities markets, found a big increase in the percentage of speculators buying oil contracts for investment purposes--"paper barrels"--instead of buying because they need the oil. But oil markets are less regulated than markets for stocks or bonds, and there's still a lot that's unknown. Congress has ordered more studies, with new regulation likely as well.

Speculators are creating a huge bubble in oil. We've just seen a bubble pop in the housing market, with home values now plummeting. And before that, the tech bubble inflated, then burst. But the run-up in oil prices is probably different. The housing boom was generated by cheap and, in some cases, fraudulent mortgages, not by a huge increase in the number of people who needed housing. The tech boom was similar to old-fashioned manias, where investors raced in hoping to cash in on a gold rush and bid the price of technology shares way above their inherent value.

But in the oil markets, there is in fact growing demand because of strong Asian economies. And supply is fairly fixed for now, since adding more oil to the market means finding new sources and spending billions to extract it, not just opening a spigot a little wider. "There are pretty strong fundamentals behind this run-up," says Sarah Emerson, another analyst at Energy Security Analysis. Speculators may be pushing oil prices somewhat higher than they would otherwise be--but a bust similar to housing or tech stocks seems unlikely.

Speculators should be banned. Few, if any, economists or energy analysts advocate this. In fact, some fairly modest regulatory changes could bring greater transparency to oil markets and force them to operate more like stock and bond markets. Buying a contract for oil futures, for instance, typically requires the buyer to put down less than 10 percent of the value of the contract; the rest can be borrowed. That allows buyers to roll up big stakes with relatively little cash. Raising the "margin requirement" to 50 percent, the usual threshold for stocks, would cool demand for oil futures, while still keeping the speculators in business. And maybe get the witch hunters off their case.

Tijs

 

On 6/11/08, Tijs Limburg <tijis311@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it looks like Cramer agrees with Bill O'Rielly that the margin for trading in oil and commodities is too low.  I happen to agree.  Any time you can buy on cheap margins, made especially cheap in the last 6 months with low interest rates, the low margin markets will move up very fast.  I think these investors ought to be required to supply 80% to 90% of the capital up front, and only buy 10% to 20% on margin.
 
Changing the margin rates would deflate all of these markets overnight.  High margin expectations works very well at controlling the volatile "less-than-ten-dollar" stocks from going completely haywire, because you cannot buy them on margin without supplying a large percentage of capital up front.
 
Time for a market change.  I think that 10 years ago, we didn't have to worry about putting in these types of restrictions in commodities, because hardly any small or individual players were in them.  Now that they are all computerized and easy to access by anyone with a discount brokerage account, the system has been broken.
 
In the late 80's and early 90's, "curbs" were introduced into the markets because computerized trading led to the stock market crash of '87.  Looks to me like computers, easy "democratized" access, and large money movement from institutional traders who lost billions in the financial industry recently, have combined to form a perfect storm for a broken commodities market. 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: donotreply@thestreet.com <donotreply@thestreet.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2008 8:12 AM
Subject: Article from TheStreet.com : Cramer: The Oil Market Is Broken
To: tijis311@gmail.com

 
TheStreet.com
Message from tijis2001@yahool.com:
Hi, I thought you would be interested in this article from TheStreet.com
Transportation
Jim Cramer
06/10/08 - 05:23 PM EDT

This column was first published on RealMoney at 2:04 p.m., June 10, 2008. For more commentary on today's action from the RealMoney writers, click here for a free trial.

Every market's so thin here and so easily pushed around by derivatives and aggressive buying and selling that it's hard to trust any prices. Does anyone believe that some large buyer of oil paid up $10 the other day? Does anyone think that a major airline or a energy user came in and said, "Buy 200,000 barrels of oil with a $10 limit"?

Read This Article

 
Visit TheStreet for more great features

TheStreet Premium Services

From the action-oriented investing ideas of Action Alerts PLUS by Jim Cramer to the expert technical trading strategies of Helene Meisler's Top Stocks, TheStreet.com offers a range of premium services to help boost your portfolio's performance. View now.

FREE NEWSLETTERS

Get an edge on the market with the help of free email newsletters like Jim Cramer's Daily Booyah!. Learn about the day's major market events, companies that sizzled or fizzled and lots more that can help you make more profitable investing decisions. Sign up.

Expert Advisors Alerts Delivered to your Inbox

Action Alerts PLUS: Cramer's personal portfolio, emails before he acts.

RealMoney: 45+ experts share their top investing ideas and analysis.

Stocks Under $10: Alerts identify undervalued stocks with profit potential.

REALMONEY SILVER

Cover all your investing bases. This popular premium service gives you access to Action Alerts PLUS, Stocks Under $10, RealMoney, Value Investor and Earnings Calls — all in 1 easy-to-use interface at 1 deeply-discounted price. Learn more.

Sponsored Links

© 1996-2008 TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com, Inc. 14 Wall Street 15th Floor, New York, NY 10005, Attention: Customer Service
Privacy Policy| Terms of Use| Help


--
Tijs Limburg
Chairman and CTO of DMX - Digital Media eXceleron, Inc.
Get eXcited!
www.dmxed.com

Blogs:
http://phystrings.blogspot.com/
http://getoutofthedark.blogspot.com/

The "Don't Tread on Me" Flag: The First Navy Jack is enjoying renewed popularity these days thanks to an order from the Secretary of the Navy that directs all U.S. Navy ships to fly the First Navy Jack for the duration of the War on Terrorism.



--
Tijs Limburg
Chairman and CTO of DMX - Digital Media eXceleron, Inc.
Get eXcited!
www.dmxed.com

Blogs:
http://phystrings.blogspot.com/
http://getoutofthedark.blogspot.com/

The "Don't Tread on Me" Flag: The First Navy Jack is enjoying renewed popularity these days thanks to an order from the Secretary of the Navy that directs all U.S. Navy ships to fly the First Navy Jack for the duration of the War on Terrorism.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Fwd: Your Letter to the Editor Ran Today



Deseret News

Concrete better than asphalt

Published: June 24, 2008

UDOT recently sent me a notice stating that they would be repaving the Van Winkle Expressway by my house in asphalt. Why continue to pave in asphalt when oil is at record highs? Asphalt is oil based, lasts three to four times less than concrete and takes five times more fuel per mile to lay.

Concrete is less prone to potholes, has a new lower cost relative to asphalt, is not subject to the volatile oil market and will decrease the pollution created by the machinery needed for paving.

We are setting precedent with new bridge installation techniques, let's set the trend for the next decade in road paving and be a greener state at the same time.

Tijs Limburg

Murray

© 2008 Deseret News Publishing Company | All rights reserved

 



--
Tijs Limburg
Chairman and CTO of DMX - Digital Media eXceleron, Inc.
Get eXcited!
www.dmxed.com

Blogs:
http://phystrings.blogspot.com/
http://getoutofthedark.blogspot.com/

The "Don't Tread on Me" Flag: The First Navy Jack is enjoying renewed popularity these days thanks to an order from the Secretary of the Navy that directs all U.S. Navy ships to fly the First Navy Jack for the duration of the War on Terrorism.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Re: FW: MCCAIN SCORES WITH OFFSHORE DRILLING PROPOSAL

All,
 
The Greatest Generation of military officials got it right in WWII when they decided to make a fake army commanded by Patton that fooled the Germans into thinking the Normandy Invasions would happen at Calais.  By the time the Nazi tank commander General Rommel got word that his panzer division was in the wrong place to thwart any invasion, it was too late, and the rest is history.  The 3rd Army swept across France, pounded through the "Bulge", and liberated Europe by marching into Berlin.
 
Morris is right in his opinion that the energy situation is like a Pearl Harbor.  The problem has been brewing for decades, and is now reaching destructive levels.
 
In this situation, I find it funny that the Dems are showing their lack of economic, business, and strategic - even diplomatic prowess on this issue by rejecting McCain's and Bush's bid to promote more offshore drilling.
 
As I see it, the way to beat the market in commodities (short of instituting new margin regulations on the commodities exchanges which I support, but that is a different matter) is by playing the short game that works so well in driving down prices in every bid-ask type of market.
 
First, a little lesson in shorting stocks or real estate.  The way it works is that you "loan" the property to the person who is going to buy it, hoping that the person who buys will end up selling it back to you at a lower price.  You therefore make money on the spread between the higher short-sale price and the lower buy-to-cover price when the property is returned to you.  Keep in mind that the fundamental reason a stock or property declines in value is because an increase of stock or similar property enters the market.  Once the excess property enters the market and the price is lowered, you cover or "close" your trade at a lower price.  It is a very effective tool in keeping prices in check and putting pressure on them, keeping them from rising too fast.
 
Just as Dick Morris states in his article, one of the biggest factors in driving up the price other than hundreds of billions of dollars added to the commodities markets in recent years is Saudi Arabia's (and OPEC as a whole) lowered production levels.  Production is at a 3% decline rate per year since 2005 in those countries. 
 
So the question is how would you convince the OPEC nations to step up production in a short (inverse) market? 
 
The answer is to threaten increase in domestic production.  It is like a bluff in betting when you are sure you have the winning hand.  Since the market is ripe for shorting (good short markets are created as prices rise continually out of step with fundamentals), the US would have the winning hand because we are one of the biggest consumers of the product.  By threatening an increase in production, the OPEC nations would be forced to either lower prices to stave off any domestic production increases, or to "call our bluff" and wait and see if we would really start drilling.
 
The OPEC nations would surely not call our bet (The US would surely start drilling if forced to by high prices), and would want to keep our business by lowering prices.
 
So, why don't the Dems play along and why don't our government officials meet in closed committee meetings and decide together that they would never really start drilling unless the bluff was called, and then announce that they have unilaterally decided to start exploration and drilling?  Imagine the economic turnaround in lower energy prices and increases in jobs (including jobs to man oil rigs) that would create!
 
See how that is like a short-sale?  Either way, we will end up buying the oil at a lower cost than it is now, either because OPEC increases the amount of oil to market, or because we do it ourselves.
 
Tijs


 


MCCAIN SCORES WITH OFFSHORE DRILLING PROPOSAL

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on FOXNews.com on June 18, 2008.

Printer-Friendly Version
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/591820/0/>

John McCain has drawn first blood in the political debate following
Barack Obama's victory in the primaries. His call yesterday for offshore
oil drilling - and Bush's decision to press the issue in Congress - puts
the Democrats in the position of advocating the wear-your-sweater
policies that made Jimmy Carter unpopular.

With gas prices nearing $5, all of the previous shibboleths need to be
discarded. Where once voters in swing states like Florida opposed
offshore drilling, the high gas prices are prompting them to reconsider.
McCain's argument that even hurricane Katrina did not cause any oil
spills from the offshore rigs in the Gulf of Mexico certainly will go
far to allay the fears of the average voter.


Obama Or McCain? Pick One!
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/591821/0/>        For
decades, Americans have dragged their feet when it comes to switching
their cars, leaving their SUVs at home, and backing alternative energy
development and new oil drilling. But the recent shock of a massive
surge in oil and gasoline prices has awakened the nation from its
complaisance. The soaring prices are the equivalent of Pearl Harbor in
jolting us out of our trance when it comes to energy.

Suddenly, everything is on the table. Offshore drilling, Alaska
drilling, nuclear power, wind, solar, flex-fuel cars, plug-in cars are
all increasingly attractive options and John McCain seems alive to the
need to go there while Obama is strangely passive. During the Democratic
primary, he opposed a gas tax holiday and continues to be against
offshore and Alaska drilling and squishy on nuclear power. That leaves
turning down your thermostat and walking to work as the Democratic
policies.


McCain has also been ratcheting up his attacks on oil speculators. With
the total value of trades in oil futures soaring from $13 billion in
2003 to $260 billion today, it is increasingly clear that it is not the
supply and demand for oil which is, alone, driving up the price, but it
is the supply and demand for oil futures which is stoking the upward
movement.

The Saudis have made a fatal mistake in not forcing down the price of
oil. We could have gone for decades as their hostage, letting their
control over our oil supplies choke us while enriching them. But they
got greedy and let the price skyrocket. The sudden shock which has sent
America reeling is just the stimulus we need for a massive movement away
from imported oil and toward new types of cars.

The political will for major change in our energy policy is now here and
those, like Obama, who don't get it need to rethink their positions. To
quote FDR, "this great nation calls for action and action now" on the
energy issue. What has been a back-burner problem now has moved onto
center stage and McCain has put himself in the forefront.

The Democratic ambivalence stems from liberal concerns about climate
change. The Party basically doesn't believe in carbon based energy and,
therefore, opposes oil exploration. That's why Obama pushes the windfall
profits tax on oil companies - a step that tells them "you drill, you
find oil, and we'll take away your profits." But Americans have their
priorities in order: more oil, more drilling AND alternative energy
sources, flex-fuel cars, plug in vehicles and nuclear power.

With his willingness to respond to the gas price crisis with bold
measures, McCain shows himself to be a pragmatist while Obama comes off
as an ideologue to puts climate change ahead of making it possible for
the average American to get to work.

Of course, the high price of gas makes it inevitable that the US will
lead the world in fighting climate change. With $5 gas, Americans will
switch en masse to cars that burn less gasoline. Already we have cut our
oil consumption by 500,000 barrels a day in the past year (about a 3%
cut). The move away from oil will be exponential from here on out,
dooming radical Islam and reversing climate change at the same time. But
while we are getting new cars, we need more oil and McCain has flanked
Obama on this issue. Big time.

Go to DickMorris.com
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/588352/0/>  to read all
of Dick's columns!


McCain Or Obama? Vote Here!
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/591821/0/>

Tim Russert's Heart Attack, What You Must Know!
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/591822/0/>

Special: Terror Chatter High, Protect Your Family!
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/591823/0/>

________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND TELL THEM THEY CAN
GET THESE COLUMNS E-MAILED TO THEM FOR FREE BY SUBSCRIBING AT
DICKMORRIS.COM <http://pr1.netatlantic.com/t/6589052/30072428/588352/0/>
!

THANK YOU!

***COPYRIGHT EILEEN MCGANN AND DICK MORRIS 2008.  REPRINTS WITH
PERMISSION ONLY***

<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/db/6589052/30072428/1.gif>

You are currently subscribed to dick-morris as: garth.limburg@slcgov.com
To unsubscribe click here
<http://pr1.netatlantic.com/u?id=30072428.21d87868c41f6914514067919d3366
24&n=T&l=dick-morris&o=6589052>
or send a blank email to
leave-6589052-30072428.21d87868c41f6914514067919d336624@pr1.netatlantic.
com       <http://www.netatlantic.com>



--
Tijs Limburg
Chairman and CTO of DMX - Digital Media eXceleron, Inc.
Get eXcited!
www.dmxed.com

Blogs:
http://phystrings.blogspot.com/
http://getoutofthedark.blogspot.com/

The "Don't Tread on Me" Flag: The First Navy Jack is enjoying renewed popularity these days thanks to an order from the Secretary of the Navy that directs all U.S. Navy ships to fly the First Navy Jack for the duration of the War on Terrorism.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Jim Cramer: The Oil Market Is Broken

Well, it looks like Cramer agrees with Bill O'Rielly that the margin for trading in oil and commodities is too low.  I happen to agree.  Any time you can buy on cheap margins, made especially cheap in the last 6 months with low interest rates, the low margin markets will move up very fast.  I think these investors ought to be required to supply 80% to 90% of the capital up front, and only buy 10% to 20% on margin.
 
Changing the margin rates would deflate all of these markets overnight.  High margin expectations works very well at controlling the volatile "less-than-ten-dollar" stocks from going completely haywire, because you cannot buy them on margin without supplying a large percentage of capital up front.
 
Time for a market change.  I think that 10 years ago, we didn't have to worry about putting in these types of restrictions in commodities, because hardly any small or individual players were in them.  Now that they are all computerized and easy to access by anyone with a discount brokerage account, the system has been broken.
 
In the late 80's and early 90's, "curbs" were introduced into the markets because computerized trading led to the stock market crash of '87.  Looks to me like computers, easy "democratized" access, and large money movement from institutional traders who lost billions in the financial industry recently, have combined to form a perfect storm for a broken commodities market. 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: donotreply@thestreet.com <donotreply@thestreet.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2008 8:12 AM
Subject: Article from TheStreet.com : Cramer: The Oil Market Is Broken
To: tijis311@gmail.com

 
TheStreet.com
Message from tijis2001@yahool.com:
Hi, I thought you would be interested in this article from TheStreet.com
Transportation
Jim Cramer
06/10/08 - 05:23 PM EDT

This column was first published on RealMoney at 2:04 p.m., June 10, 2008. For more commentary on today's action from the RealMoney writers, click here for a free trial.

Every market's so thin here and so easily pushed around by derivatives and aggressive buying and selling that it's hard to trust any prices. Does anyone believe that some large buyer of oil paid up $10 the other day? Does anyone think that a major airline or a energy user came in and said, "Buy 200,000 barrels of oil with a $10 limit"?

Read This Article

 
Visit TheStreet for more great features

TheStreet Premium Services

From the action-oriented investing ideas of Action Alerts PLUS by Jim Cramer to the expert technical trading strategies of Helene Meisler's Top Stocks, TheStreet.com offers a range of premium services to help boost your portfolio's performance. View now.

FREE NEWSLETTERS

Get an edge on the market with the help of free email newsletters like Jim Cramer's Daily Booyah!. Learn about the day's major market events, companies that sizzled or fizzled and lots more that can help you make more profitable investing decisions. Sign up.

Expert Advisors Alerts Delivered to your Inbox

Action Alerts PLUS: Cramer's personal portfolio, emails before he acts.

RealMoney: 45+ experts share their top investing ideas and analysis.

Stocks Under $10: Alerts identify undervalued stocks with profit potential.

REALMONEY SILVER

Cover all your investing bases. This popular premium service gives you access to Action Alerts PLUS, Stocks Under $10, RealMoney, Value Investor and Earnings Calls — all in 1 easy-to-use interface at 1 deeply-discounted price. Learn more.

Sponsored Links

© 1996-2008 TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com, Inc. 14 Wall Street 15th Floor, New York, NY 10005, Attention: Customer Service
Privacy Policy| Terms of Use| Help


--
Tijs Limburg
Chairman and CTO of DMX - Digital Media eXceleron, Inc.
Get eXcited!
www.dmxed.com

Blogs:
http://phystrings.blogspot.com/
http://getoutofthedark.blogspot.com/

The "Don't Tread on Me" Flag: The First Navy Jack is enjoying renewed popularity these days thanks to an order from the Secretary of the Navy that directs all U.S. Navy ships to fly the First Navy Jack for the duration of the War on Terrorism.